The Internet Social And Business Platform Bias Debate Against Republicans Solved

STOP The Communist Democrat Party P.C. Police Whom Are Only Political Activists

  Opinion Written In Response To Article Posted On

Business Insider: Jeff Bezos: Today's internet is a 'confirmation bias machine' that could help autocratic regimes

Written By James Allan | 7-8-2019

Sure, even though my voice isn't suppose to be heard because I'm a Republican and even worse a "Tea Partier" I must give an opinion based in reality as to what the answer is to all the lopsidedness that is the internet run and in favor of the democrat party. All popular search engines, social media and news web sites on the internet are run by democrats and clear cases of bias against Republican speech is present.

As our politicians are at fault for china acquiring all our manufacturing it's the "Republican Party's" fault for all media and internet establishments favoring the democrat communist party because the Republican Party was being run by "Libertarian Republican Rinos" who didn't want to piss off democrat voters who they cozy up to.

The first thing any democrat will do is destroy the communication of its foe like good devout communists so only communist party propaganda can be broadcast and heard and this is exactly what happened all because Republican Party "Rino" leaders looked the other way when they should have been attacking.

I say the rise of communism in the democrat party is the fault of the "Republican Party" because Republicans succeeded in recruiting the "libertarian party" as an added effort to get more votes for "Republican Party" candidates which was "Risky". This recruitment is a huge failure because "libertarians" only vote for "libertarians" and they do indeed support many democrat social issues. Blame on Republicans for putting overwhelming trust in their leaders. There's still many "libertarians" entrenched in the Republican Party.

The only solution that can be is as long as these internet social and business platforms are operating from the United States they will be forced to comply with the 1st amendment of "Free Speech" as a FREEDOM that is our right to practice anywhere that is a public place. This is not regulating the internet but only regulation of the internet entities operating from within the United States. Any profit taking "Internet Business Entity" is subject to ALL the laws that govern "Profit Taking" and "Freedom Of Speech" of any voice if the social media site is open to all communication with others.

OK, some speech that is pure filth and violent will not be allowed as a social staple agreed to by all. If a social platform is "Themed" and is being presented as a "Single Subject" web site then other speech not in step with the "Theme" of the site can be banned. ANY social or business platform that is engaged in profit taking CANNOT ban any speech if the web site is NOT "Themed"  to a specific subject.

Hey, if any web site is engaged in any kind of profit taking then it must be labeled as a PUBLIC DOMAIN and can't be engaged in BIAS against any person speaking freely.

Most social platforms these days have a member "Blocking" function and since the people using these social platforms are not profit taking they can restrict FREE SPEECH on their personal public platform pages, groups and timelines if they so chose. If I operate a "group", "page" or "timeline" on any social web site that is profit taking through sales or offering up advertising space I myself can BLOCK anybody I feel doesn't follow my beliefs, thoughts or way. If I operate a page designed to advertise something I'm selling for profit and the page is "Themed" I can restrict negative speech that attacks my product or isn't of the theme.

All U.S. Citizens have the right to "Freedom Of Speech". Under the "United States Constitution" the federal government can regulate business and what business says and does but only if the business crosses state lines or deals with foreign entities:

Article I, section 8 of the U.S. Constitution expressly permits Congress “to regulate commerce with foreign Nations and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.”

Depending on which laws that were created between the time the U.S. Constitution was finished and now is what regulates "Business Speech" and activities. Any "Entity" that attempts to make a profit is a business and depending on which "Government Body" or "Judge" is in your area is whom regulates "Speech Of A Business". The U.S. Constitution doesn't specify "Freedom Of Speech" for business. In my own interpretation everything a business does or says can be regulated unless a judge says otherwise which can be challenged.

Cornell Law School: Commercial Speech

"Freedom Of Speech" for business is solely being handled by, "City Counsels" and "Judges". So far the "Judges" mostly say businesses do have "1st Amendment" protections but this is just what judges say on their own with absolutely NO basis to back it up. The "Commerce Clause" says nothing about "Business Speech" and only deals with foreign businesses and businesses that cross state lines. Most small businesses not operating over state lines are only regulated by the towns they are in but the products they import from another state are under federal law.

Cornell Law School: Commerce Clause

Cornell Law School: Among The Several States

These social web sites are operating from the United States and their activities are over state lines with business interests in foreign countries which completely makes them subject to regulations when they stifle free speech.

As to the social web site owners, boards of directors or consortium's producing speech as a business, well, that's all solely up to the judge that likes of dislikes what the business has to say because the "United States Constitution" has no clause that pertains to what a business can say. If a social media website wants to restrict itself to a certain city or state then they will have to abide only by state or city laws concerning what they say as a business.

"Freedom Of Speech" is for people whom are individuals or in groups and NOT profit taking under a fictitious business name. Any web site that operates from the United States is subject to ALL federal business laws and regulations because they do indeed cross state lines and most operate in foreign countries. 

Again, "Any Regulation Of Social Media" is NOT regulating the internet but only business entities operating from the United States that are taking profit in some form.

  Tea Party Main Street Home